Nango dev is one of the unified integration tools that market themselves as “open source” open source

You might think oh then you see their source code and you might also think that it will be free. But it makes sense…


In short, they claim to be an “open source integration platform”, but the only thing that is available in open source is API proxy. Most other embedded integration vendors promise to build it in a few weeks or even in a week for you. You don’t need to build by yourself if you trust a vendor.

Because for us being a vendor is to become a development partner and support you with new integrations. cons:

Users looking to self-host Nango syncs will find that it needs to be supported, with only authorization and proxying being self-hostable. For users who require specific hosting solutions, Nango is not working. That means for businesses that prioritize data authority and wish to manage their integrations within their infrastructure, this limitation is a critical factor to consider.

nango self hosting

Let's start your first connection in You have to build it one by one and might ask yourself “Then what is the easy part of unified integrations?” Also, their custom sync documentation doesn’t show how to add a new app that is not in Nango yet..

starting integration nango

Now let's take a closer look at Nango and understand why companies look for its alternatives and what strengths their competitors

nango dev alternatives

Who is the best alternative? emerges as a strong contender, especially for businesses seeking deep customization and scalability. Here's why it stands out:

  • Customization and Scalability: Offers a wide array of pre-built integrations and deep customization options.
  • AI-Powered Efficiency: Automates the creation of similar integrations, saving significant time.
  • Developer-Friendly: With comprehensive documentation, it appeals to a broad user base, unlike's more limited focus.
  • Pricing Model: Offers a more flexible and cost-effective pricing strategy, only charging when users have live production integrations.

Here is all you need to build your unified API stack ⤓⤓

add apps integration

The choice between and depends on the specific integration needs, desired level of control and customization, and the targeted application domain. Nango offers more flexibility and control for custom integrations, while Merge provides a broad range of pre-built integrations with a unified data model, suited for standardized integration needs.

Nango's strength over Merge

Nango's open unified API architecture allows customization of pre-built integrations and development of custom integrations, offering full control while minimizing maintenance overhead. This makes it a better fit for those needing access to data or APIs not included in Merge’s model, or for those who wish to avoid constraints by external providers.

Nango's weakness over Merge's strength lies in its extensive range of pre-built integrations and a unified data model, making it suitable for a wide array of standardized integration requirements, especially in HR, payroll, accounting, CRM, and ticketing.

Tray Embedded

Tray Embedded is known for its extensive connector library and visual workflow builder. However, it struggles with custom connector development, scalability, and API limitations. Its high pricing model can be prohibitive for many businesses.

Nango's strength over Tray

Nango's approach might be more cost-effective for startups or businesses with specific integration needs, while Tray's higher starting price might be a consideration for smaller companies or those with limited budgets.

Nango's weakness over Tray

Nango emphasizes removing the infrastructural burden from developers, whereas Tray offers a rich visual workflow builder, which is user-friendly but might not scale well for complex integrations.


Nango offers more control and flexibility for developers who need to create or customize their integrations deeply, while Apideck is suited for those seeking an integration marketplace and simpler, more managed integration experiences, albeit with some limitations in terms of customization and integration depth.

Nango vs Apideck

Nango seems more suited for developers who need a balance of pre-built and custom integrations, while Apideck may appeal to those looking for a marketplace to showcase integrations and simpler, managed integration experiences

Conclusion While each platform has its strengths, is a robust choice for businesses looking for a blend of customization, scalability, and developer-friendliness. Its AI-driven approach to integration creation and flexible pricing makes it an attractive option for a range of integration needs, setting it apart from and other competitors.

Share this post
  • Share Post to Facebook
  • Share Post to X
  • Share Post to Linkedin